Search for: "E. Jackson" Results 241 - 260 of 3,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Early Edition: July 12, 2023
12 Jul 2023, 1:57 am by Seán Binder
Julian E. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
Stamer To Discuss Emerging Impact of Dobbs on Employers, Employee Benefits and Healthcare At SPBAA Fall Conference
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
For additional information about Stamer and her experience or to access other publications by Stamer see CynthiaStamer.com or contact Stamer directly via e-mail or telephone (214) 452-8287. [read post]
HR & Benefits Update - http://slphrbenefitsupdate.com/
Blog Post: Egan on Entities: Understanding Changes to Texas Organization Code and Delaware Business Statutes
5 Jul 2023, 12:24 pm by Joshua Lloyd
Appendix E provides detailed insight on designing, adopting, and defending shareholder rights plans. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Meet the Summer 2023 Creative Digital Projects Participants (2 of 3)
5 Jul 2023, 6:42 am by Jennifer González
Tommy Jackson is a third-year student at the University of Missouri-Columbia majorin [read post]
In Custodia Legis - http://blogs.loc.gov/law
Huzzah for the Court in Moore v. Harper
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
[Josh Blackman] Goldilocks and the Four Non-Originalists
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm by Josh Blackman
S. 75, 92 (1966) (Stewart, J., concurring); see also E. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Just The Facts, Ma'am
3 Jul 2023, 8:52 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Jackson made similar claims: The majority cannot deny this factual finding. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am by Gene Takagi
” “[W]e have permitted race-based admissions only within the confines of narrow restrictions. [read post]
Nonprofit Law Blog - http://www.nonprofitlawblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "'We Came Here to Exclude the Negro. Nothing Short of This Will Answer.'"
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
From Justice Jackson's opinion, joined by Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of certiorari today in Harness v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court strikes down Biden student-loan forgiveness program
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Justice Elena Kagan dissented, in an opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Holds That Speech Creators (e.g., Web Designers) Can't Be Required to Create Content They Object to,
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith will create these websites to communicate ideas—namely, to "celebrate and promote the couple's wedding and unique love story" and to "celebrat[e] and promot[e]" what Ms. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Stanford’s Rick Banks on Race-Based College Admissions SCOTUS Decision
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm by Ralph Richard Banks, Q&A with Sharon Driscoll
  Thankfully, Justice Jackson in particular did highlight some of those benefits. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/
Racial considerations associated with admission to colleges and univesities violate the Constitution of the United States.
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Racial considerations associated with admission to colleges and univesities violate the Constitution of the United States.
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Constitutional Democracy Without Constitutionalism
29 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Decides: "True Threats" Exception Requires Showing that Speaker Was "Reckless," i.e.,
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Kagan, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Kavanaugh, and Jackson, held that a showing of recklessness was necessary and sufficient: [T]he First Amendment … requires proof that the defendant had some subjective understanding of the threatening nature of his statements …[,] but that a mental state of recklessness is sufficient. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Jackson, J. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Early Edition: June 26, 2023
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
Julian E. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
In Brief: A Year Without Roe (with Caroline Kitchener)
26 Jun 2023, 1:00 am by CAFE
Jackson Women's Health Organization, 6/24/2022 Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
Stay Tuned with Preet - https://cafe.com/stay-tuned-podcast/
En Passant Suspension Clause Originalism in Jones v. Hendrix
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
Instead I want to focus on an important disagreement between Justice Jackson and the majority.In favor of her reading of subsection (e), Justice Jackson invoked, among other things, the principle of constitutional avoidance. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/