Search for: "Eady v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire,… [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The case of NT1 v Google was heard by Warby J on 27 and 28 February and 1 March 2018. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
In an article concerning the state of journalism in Australia Margaret Simons argues that technological changes are at last being relefected in a shift in attitudes to funding public interest journalism. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 The case was tried by Sir David Eady on 31 October to 4 November and 7 November 2016. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:13 am by Cyberleagle
Eady J said of that provision: “In order to be able to characterise something as ‘unlawful’ a person would need to know something of the strength or weakness of available defences” (Bunt v Tilley). [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On Monday 18 June 2012 the trial of Luke Cooper v Evening Standard and Associated Newspapers will begin before Eady J and a jury. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Mr Justice Eady handed down judgment in OPQ v BJM ([2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)). [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 22 May 2015 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of QRS v Beach. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Bailii has recently made available a judgment of 22 June 2016 in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1534 (QB)) in which Sir David Eady made an extended civil restraint order against the claimant. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jefferies co-authored a letter to the Guardian last Monday, stating that CFA reforms would “effectively remove the opportunity of people of ordinary means to seek redress when they have been libelled or intruded upon, or where they need to defend a libel claim”. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
  Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]