Search for: "Eli Lilly "
Results 241 - 260
of 2,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2019, 10:14 am
Eli Lilly & Co. that sovereign immunity does not apply where the state acts only as the plaintiff, and therefore the right of UT to choose the forum does not apply because the Eleventh Amendment only applies to suits against a state, not by a state. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm
Utilizing of the media, including social media, is an essential aspect of any civil litigator’s strategic arsenal. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 2:05 am
ITC and Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
| BEAUTY & THE BAY not an infringement of BEAUTY BAY, says High Court | US copyright registration for the Tommy Hilfiger Flag denied due to insufficient originality | The reemergence of issues surrounding copyright and the Australian Aboriginal Flag… | Gigi Hadid, Smile for the Copyright | Eli Lilly v Fresenius Kabi: a decision far from equivalent to what has been decided before | Re-establishment: An isolated error in a well-functioning system may not be equivalent to… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:54 pm
Hospira, Inc. and Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
by Dennis Crouch Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The IPCom guidance are provided for readers' convenience at the end of this post.The IPCom factors have since been applied in Actavis v Pharmacia [2014] EWHC 2265 (stay was ordered), and Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313 (stay was not ordered) (IPKat post here).David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), applied the IPCom guidance to the fact of the case in Coloplast v Salts. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
| BEAUTY & THE BAY not an infringement of BEAUTY BAY, says High Court | US copyright registration for the Tommy Hilfiger Flag denied due to insufficient originality | The reemergence of issues surrounding copyright and the Australian Aboriginal Flag… | Gigi Hadid, Smile for the Copyright | Eli Lilly v Fresenius Kabi: a decision far from equivalent to what has been decided before | Re-establishment: An isolated error in a well-functioning system may not be equivalent to… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| BEAUTY & THE BAY not an infringement of BEAUTY BAY, says High Court | US copyright registration for the Tommy Hilfiger Flag denied due to insufficient originality | The reemergence of issues surrounding copyright and the Australian Aboriginal Flag… | Gigi Hadid, Smile for the Copyright | Eli Lilly v Fresenius Kabi: a decision far from equivalent to what has been decided before | Re-establishment: An isolated error in a well-functioning system may not be equivalent to… [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
Court of Justice of the European Union Author Cedric Puisney Licence CC NY 2.0 Wikipedia Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Arnold) Eli Lilly And Company v Genentech, Inc No. 2 [2019] EWHC 388 (Pat) (1 March 2019) One of the issues before Mr Justice Arnold when he tried Eli Lilly and Company and others v Genentech, Inc [2019] EWHC 387 (Pat) (1 March 2019) was whether [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 5:43 am
Bart van WezenbeekThe scope of a patent is to be interpreted according to Art. 69 EPC and the Protocol. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:38 am
Colonel Eli Lilly, Source Wikipedia Eli Lilly Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Arnold) Eli Lilly and Co. and others v Genentech Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:08 pm
In response to the final rule, three drug companies—Amgen, Merck and Eli Lilly—filed suit, claiming HHS needed congressional approval to impose such a requirement. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
IPKat friend, Alexander de Leeuw (Brinkhof) reports on the latest installment in the Netherlands.Over to Alex:"On 19 June 2019 the Dutch District Court of The Hague – the Court with exclusive jurisdiction over patent matters in the Netherlands – issued a decision in merits proceedings between Eli Lilly & Company and Fresenius Kabi regarding Fresenius’ pemetrexed product (a machine translation as published by Mattie de Koning of Simmons is found… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:56 am
Eli Lilly’s patent (EP 1 313 508) has a Swiss form claim relating to the “use of pemetrexed disodium” in combination with vitamin B12 for inhibiting tumor growth. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Three drug companies – Amgen, Merck, and Eli Lilly – and the nation’s largest advertising group announced they were suing the administration over its new policy of requiring prescription drug manufacturers to disclose list prices in television ads. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
The patent was exclusively licenced to Eli Lilly. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
The patent was exclusively licenced to Eli Lilly. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:33 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation's petition to the Supreme Court in a case against Apple; AAG Makan Delrahim's remarks about misuse of antitrust law by U.S. courts; Eli Lilly's petition to the Supreme Court regarding functional claiming rule; cert granted in Allen v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:33 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation's petition to the Supreme Court in a case against Apple; AAG Makan Delrahim's remarks about misuse of antitrust law by U.S. courts; Eli Lilly's petition to the Supreme Court regarding functional claiming rule; cert granted in Allen v. [read post]
