Search for: "English v. Industrial Commission" Results 241 - 260 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Such funds are covered by the Securities Exchange Act (1934 Act) and are required to file disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), just like other publicly traded companies. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had written previously in this blog about the investment arbitration between White Industries (Australia) Ltd. against the Government of India. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
A former local newspaper journalist has been given a ten-year anti-social behaviour order “for writing ‘offensive’ blogs about members of his local community“, according to industry site HoldtheFrontPage. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
McEwen* Introduction The American Invents Act is a result of pressures from diverse industries and groups. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm by Alex Duperouzel
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009) published on the SFAT’s website at http://www.sfat.gov.hk/english/determination/AN-8_9-2009-Determination.pdf, para 163, para 172-182, para 192-193, para 194 -204 respectively.5. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
Among other things, the PCC was, in Sir David’s view, “not the truly independent body which it should be…”, being a “body set up by the industry, financed by the industry, dominated by the industry, and operating a code of practice devised by the industry and which is over-favourable to the industry. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Daithí
Tom Gibbons (Manchester) looked at the relationship between reputation and privacy within Article 8 ECHR, and the differences between English law on defamation and on privacy. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:54 pm
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} (The following post has been contributed by Piyush Prasad, who is an alumnus (B.Sc. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 7:53 pm by The Legal Blog
It noted that the decision in Baljit Singh was based on concession made in light of an earlier decision of this Court in South Asia Industries (P) Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
TYLER DICKOVICK University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, c2011 JF60 .D49 2011 See Catalog Chemical industry -- Waste disposal -- United States POLLUTION LIMITS AND POLLUTERS' EFFORTS TO COMPLY: THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT / DIETRICH H. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
TYLER DICKOVICK University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, c2011 JF60 .D49 2011 See Catalog Chemical industry -- Waste disposal -- United States POLLUTION LIMITS AND POLLUTERS' EFFORTS TO COMPLY: THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT / DIETRICH H. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
" is the title of a two-day centennial celebration of the Norwegian Industrial Property Office, Oslo. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]