Search for: "Entertainment USA Inc" Results 241 - 260 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
DHL Express (USA), Inc. 14-1225Issue: Whether common-law fraud claims are preempted by the Americans with Disabilities Act or by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 in the absence of a determination that such claims expressly reference air or motor carriers’ rates, routes, or services, or that entertaining such claims would have a significant economic effect on such rates, routes, or services. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Corus Entertainment Inc 2020 BCSC 1533 Milman J granted a motion for the summary dismissal of a number of libel actions on the basis of defences of justification and fair comment. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:42 pm
"  Read more here (from USA Today). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:29 pm
Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., 448 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 2006), reached the opposite conclusion in a case where Sony had a license to use a recording of plaintiff's song. [read post]
25 May 2008, 5:43 am
Penguin Books USA, Inc., 109 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir. 1997) cert. dismissed 521 U.S. 1146 (1997) is a very bad parody case. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm by Howard Knopf
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> brought to you by Prof. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm by Larry
The Court of International Trade has issued the much anticipated (at least by me) decision on the merits in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Ben
"Entertainers don't want to do that very often," said Steele. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
Company-A was the owner of a certain property in Queens County, which it bought to develop into a 12-story commercial building, with retail spaces, office condominiums, entertainment complexes and parking. [read post]