Search for: "Epp v. Epp"
Results 241 - 260
of 519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:20 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that the case, along with Jennings v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Dan Epps look at some of the cases on this week’s argument agenda and discuss Chief Justice John Roberts’ recent recusal in Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
First up is Nelson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
” Briefly: At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Daniel Epps break down the court’s latest grants, the February argument calendar and the supplemental briefing order in Jennings v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:50 am
As sentencing isa matter for the judge in English law, giving the sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) rather than an Extended Sentence for Public Protection (EPP) was lawful, and did not offend against the principle of ‘lex mitior’ as the maximum sentence for the appellant’s crime was the same under either IPP or EPP. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Additional coverage comes from Garrett Epps in The Atlantic, who observes that over the years since Baker v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
In Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 5:26 am
Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding intellectual disability and executions in Moore v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Russo, Religious Freedom in Faith-Based Educational Institutions in the Wake of Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” Next up is Lightfoot v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Lynch v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Dan Epps discuss court-related news from last week, including Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s comments about NFL players’ refusals to stand for the national anthem, the week’s oral arguments and new grants, and the court’s per curiam opinion in Bosse v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps examines Buck v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:46 pm
The question in Bravo-Fernandez is whether the collateral estoppel branch of double jeopardy law, as articulated in Ashe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses next Term’s double jeopardy case Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
