Search for: "Ex Parte Taylor"
Results 241 - 260
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
IPSO chairman Sir Alan Moses has said unpicking legislation brought in after part one of the Leveson Inquiry, including the Section 40 cost provision amendments, could take up to 15 years. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Taylor v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Anthony D’Esposito got his break in politics thanks in part due to his connections with a group of powerful Republicans in Nassau County, who are famous for hiring their friends and family into local government. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
” Lawyers at the time advised The Sun that a libel action could cost a million pounds and loss was inevitable, in part because the system “rewarded his deliberate targeting of vulnerable victims. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
The same result was reached by the Special Court for Sierra Leone in the Charles Taylor case. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Spike in Demand, and Fees, for Lobbyists with Ties to Trump DNyuz – Kenneth Vogel and Kate Kelly (New York Times) | Published: 11/7/2024 In corporate boardrooms and foreign capitals, there is a scramble to sign lobbyists who could help navigate an incoming administration viewed with uncertainty and concern. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Johnson has been in Congress for less than seven years and lacks the deep bench of long-time, trusted aides and ex-staffers that K Street usually relies on to curry favor on Capitol Hill. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm
The opinion makes two principal constitutional claims: the committee’s refusal to allow an attorney representing the government to attend a deposition of a government official (1) “unconstitutionally interferes with the President’s right to control the disclosure of privileged information” (Part II.A of the opinion) and (2) “interferes with the President’s authority to supervise the Executive Branch’s interactions with Congress” (Part… [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Matt Gaetz and several young women was part of an effort to illegally influence Gaetz about medical marijuana, people briefed on the matter said. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Part III (China Law Blog) Bitter taste avoided: South Korean Zhenjiang Vinegar and Costa Rican Confucius Institute trademarks rejected (IP Dragon) Ecuador Ecuador’s ex officio anti-piracy enforcement hits constitutional snag (IP tango) Europe Stronger IP rights in EU-Korea FTA: Precedent for future FTAs? [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:16 am
Taylor Mach. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:01 pm
"Part of their restitution is they have to spend significant time learning to cope with these stressors. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:12 am
Although there were differences between them, these played no part in her conclusions on liability overall. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Case 8:08-cv-02212-SDM-MAP Document 12 Filed 11/19/2008 Page 1 of 17IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDATAMPA DIVISIONWAYNE TOMPKINS,Petitioner,v.CASE NO. 8:08-cv-2212-T-23MAPWALTER A. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
., Patton Production Company, and Puls, Taylor & Woodson, L.L.P. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
