Search for: "F Ross"
Results 241 - 260
of 820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 1:15 pm
Patent and Trademark Office “Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments” (the 2013 Joint Policy Statement). [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Ross Dress for Less, Inc., 833 F. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel suggests that the omission of any mention of Chevron v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:33 am
Robert F. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
(f) 6.25% > $0 Mont. 6.75% > $0 Nebr. 5.58% > $0 7.81% > $100,000 Nev. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
The concurring opinion (by Justices Siggins and Ross) agrees the CEQA claim was timely served under Public Resources Code § 21167.6; like the lead opinion, it does not explore the correctness or consequences of treating that service provision as a conflicting CEQA “statute of limitations” – something prior published decisions addressing it have never done. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
FEDERAL EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEDURES By Alan T. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:07 am
The Court concluded that the plaintiff had sufficiently pleaded a Title VII hostile work environment claim.Now seems like a good time to share Ross Runkel's Case of the Week video series too. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Gross receipts taxes, also known as “turnover taxes,” have returned as a revenue option for policymakers after being dismissed for decades as inefficient and unsound tax policy. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel notes that the recent decision in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel remarks that “[s]ome pundits were surprised that the Court would issue a ‘pro-worker,’ ‘anti-arbitration’ decision, failing to understand that the Justices all do their best to be faithful to the words Congress puts into its statutes. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
., 676 F.3d at 1096. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 8:39 am
., LLP, 633 F.3d 496, 507 (6th Cir. 2011). [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 5:37 am
Writes Ross Douthat in the NYT. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
Moriarty, 106 F. 886, 891 (S.D.N.Y.1901)[2] 13 USC §195[3]Dept. of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
Stavins of the John F. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:39 am
PLC, 255 F. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:00 am
Ross argues that the Navy's forward presence is strained, while China's capabilities are growing steadily. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:24 am
Ross, 356 S.W.3d 924, 929–30 (Tex. 2011); BP Am. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” At The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Tara Bahrampour report that “[t]he court’s action makes it unlikely that Ross will have to give a deposition in the case but allows the suit to go forward, at least temporarily. [read post]
