Search for: "FIRST BANCORP" Results 241 - 260 of 486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm by Rich
It’s not very often we get a favorable decision from the Supreme Court these days, particularly a unanimous one, but that happened today in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:38 am by Deb Boiarsky
By Deb Boiarsky In a bit of a surprise, the United States Supreme Court declined today in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am by Shannon Moran
McCallister serves a board member of Fifth Third Bancorp and Zoetis Inc. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
After the Court issues its decision in Fifth Third Bancorp, if the crowd came down on the other side, I will write a blog post on which one I thought was right: the stand-in for the faculty of Harvard (i.e., the sitting justices) or the stand-in for the first hundred folks in the phone book (i.e. the voting public). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:52 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
At a minimum, the Supreme Court’s eventual opinion in Fifth Third Bancorp will make a lot more sense if you read the article first. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 3:51 am by Broc Romanek
– who forwarded the first Form SD filed with the SEC yesterday. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
The First Circuit, which tends to favor fact specific resolutions of complex ERISA disputes over sweeping doctrinal approaches to resolving them, rejected a variation on the presumption in 2009 in Bunch v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 Fifth Third Bancorp had an increase of 0.1 percentage point. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Bently’s first, historical question: “What it is that we identify as new? [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
This governmental preference for religion, as opposed to irreligion, is forbidden by the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:52 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court limited its review of the Bancorp case to the first question. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 11:48 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
US Bancorp, the court determined that the trustee was not liable because the tenant’s injuries arose not from the existence of an unsafe condition, but because the tenant chose to exit her residence at night without first turning on the light that illuminated the area where the tenant fell. [read post]