Search for: "FRAME v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 6,630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 7:23 am
From Tyree B. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
In some states, there is a specific time frame for appealing a divorce decree, while in others you may be able to challenge it at any point if you can prove a valid reason. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:42 am
In L.C.C. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
And as I pointed out here, disembodied designs are already automatically (and costlessly) protected by copyright as long as they can meet the low standard of creativity mandated by Feist v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:55 pm
The piece contains a lot of important themes and interesting discussions, including the Supreme Court's decision last term in Brackeen v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:49 pm
Discussions and relevant cert. papers are available here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/diaz-v-united-states/ The petition for certiorari frames the “Question Presented” as follows: Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) provides: “In a criminual case, an expert witness must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime charged or of a… [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:27 am
In particular, Apple has asked the Supreme Court to limit the scope of a permanent injunction issued against it by a lower federal court in the Northern District of California in Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am
In Lubbe v Cape, Connelly v RTZ and Vedanta, the English courts accepted jurisdiction, acknowledging that the absence of a means of funding or experienced lawyers to handle the case in a host state will lead to a real risk of the non-availability of substantial justice. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am
Decisions this Week United StatesPennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
See NAACP v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Assn. v M.https://nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_04835.htm [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
(Peter Mensch v Louise Mensch, NYSCEF index no. 309381/2017.) [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
WHO has been pivotal in framing and operationalizing COVID-19 infodemic countermeasures through initiatives that monitor harmful information, and counter false information. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
