Search for: "Fabricant v. Department of Justice"
Results 241 - 260
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 6:12 am
Regal and INSCORP appealed, and the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed, with two justices dissenting. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:29 am
In Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross ;2010 NY Slip Op 50620(U) ;Decided on April 7, 2010 ;Supreme Court, New York County ;Schlesinger, J. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
As the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:51 am
During oral argument, she asked a lawyer from the Department of Justice who'd made that argument,Do you really want to send a message ... that they should not merely flinch but stop if they have reason to believe that evidence is fabricated? [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
United States (for a CT discussion see State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:17 am
Souter, now departed from the court, in the majority. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy has argued that prosecutors cannot be held liable for any fabrication that ends up being used at trial. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:55 pm
Justice Sotomayor put me and everyone else to shame during oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:56 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
Recently the Department of Justice filed an amicus brief (via Jonathan Adler) arguing that prosecutors who fabricate evidence should be entitled to absolute immunity. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm
Trust Co. of N.Y., 6 AD3d 356, 356-357, lv denied 3 NY3d 605, cert denied 543 US 1148; Matter of Guetta [Raxon Fabrics Corp.], 123 AD2d 40, 41), and thus the SUM arbitrator was not required to state that he had considered that contention.Two justices dissented and voted to affirm the award. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 1:10 am
When Illinois Congressman Henry Hyde stuck an amendment into an appropriations bill in 1997, the Department of Justice went bonkers. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
" Justice Scalia next pressed Miller on the facts of Rewis v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
The First Department's decision in this case mirror's Justice Ling-Cohan's decision in that matter. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:06 am
The courthouse doors will literally be barred to their seeking any justice from manufacturers. [read post]
