Search for: "Fee v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 6,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2008, 5:47 pm
But this trend stalled due to the Supreme Court's decision in Smiley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
Abstract below: The United States Supreme Court has considered on many occasions the constitutionality of government fees that indigent persons were unable to pay. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 pm
Thompson of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut awarded $120 million in attorneys’ fees and $3.3 million in costs in Carlson v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:53 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:07 pm
Any case assessment must begin with planning for these contingencies and advising clients on what other similar disputes actually can cost. -- Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 9/27/11Cite: SKF USA Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:38 pm
’” Kipu relied, in part, on case law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Degussa Admixtures, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Cook v Nassau County Police Dept., 140 AD3d 1059, the Appellate Division noted that the State Legislature, "[in] order to create a clear deterrent to unreasonable delays and denials of access [and thereby] encourage every unit of government to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of FOIL", provided for the assessment of an attorney's fee and other litigation costs in FOIL proceedings. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
In Budinich v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
" Aventis CropScience v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
The dissent cited to United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 9:01 am
The Act states that “the court in its discretion may allow the recovery of full costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm
Helena, Inc. v. [read post]
