Search for: "Feldman v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Yesterday’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
Line Material Co. (1948), along with United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:04 am
United States, the “rails to trails” case. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am
United States, involving threats made on social media. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
United States, according to Bloomberg News. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
United States, it upheld the conviction of a fleeing bank robber who broke into an elderly woman’s home and instructed her to go with him to her computer room – four to nine feet away – so that police would not see him. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment. The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for threatening statements he made on Facebook, dominated Court-related coverage and commentary. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
United States, No.13-983. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm
The Louisiana couples’ lawyers, in urging the Supreme Court to take on their case now along with any of those it accepted from the Sixth Circuit, made four points in favor of early review of the Louisiana case: First, the judge’s decision in favor of the ban was the first in the nation to uphold a state ban in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
” Feldman adds that “some speculated” that Kennedy’s liberal vote in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:05 am
Feldman thus became the first by a federal court to reject a constitutional challenge since the Justices’ decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
The 6th Circuit still leaves the courts looking into the minds of religionists and assessing the religiosity of their motivations, when it would be better to be "done with this business of judicially examining other people's faiths" (to quote the last line of my all-time favorite judicial opinion, Justice Jackson dissenting in United States v. [read post]
