Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 241 - 260
of 15,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2024, 8:25 am
Go figure. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Research and Resources LoMonte, Frank and Leibert, Stephanie, Internet Famous: Are Online Influencers and Micro-Celebrities Public Figures Under Defamation Law? [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
The defendant in Schenck v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Let’s see if we can figure it out. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 5:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm
Chapman v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
This is a pretty good opinion to figure out where you generally stand on the resentencing provisions of Section 1172.6, which "amend[ed] the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine, as it relates to murder, to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
The Georgia courts have established that a district attorney should be disqualified when there is a personal interest in the defendant’s conviction (Whitworth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:41 am
However, a September 2019 New York State intermediate appellate court decision – Vega v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
Burch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
We note, however, that questions about the domain of inquiry—of in-market vs. out-of-market effects—can arise in conduct cases brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (as in Ohio v American Express, where the Supreme Court considered both sides of a two-sided transactional platform as a single market) or under Section 2 (as in Aspen Skiing Co., where the Court, considering allegedly exclusionary conduct, held that “it is appropriate to examine the effect of the… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Pereida v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 8:05 am
For example, in the Bosnia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 5:56 pm
In Wages and White Lion Investments (DBA Triton Distribution) v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
"Todd Spitzer and Greg Totten, "Did Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
Huhne asserts that phone-hacking was pursued not only for journalistic purposes, but also “to target political figures who were unsympathetic” to the news organisation and “gather intelligence from the heart of government in order to further News’ objectives. [read post]
