Search for: "Fish v. Government Employees" Results 241 - 260 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 5:30 am by Rosalind English
For some time he was granted a diet which did not include pork, but other meats and fish. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
"To catch a big fish, you need to put a lot of bait in the water. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
”  And writing for the Opinionator blog of the New York Times, Stanley Fish discusses the decisions in Bennett and Brown v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:52 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  In a request for information that the EEOC later converted into a subpoena, the government demanded that UMPC provide 10 categories of information about “all employees who were terminated after 14 weeks of a medical leave of absence…. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm by Kevin Sheerin
”   Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:52 pm by David Ettinger
Maikhio:  (1) Do Fish and Game Code sections 1006 and 2012 authorize a warden to make a traffic stop when there is reasonable suspicion to believe the driver has been fishing? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Bloomsbury International Limited and others v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, heard 23 – 24 March 2011. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Mark Fenster
Cronon and his supporters, including Paul Krugman, are boxed in: Their political and ethical commitments make them strong supporters of FOI laws and open government; they just don't like this request, because it's a form of harassment and political payback, a fishing expedition that may turn up nothing but that will certainly intimidate public employees' political activism. 3. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDocket: 10-605Issue(s): Whether, under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act, the government must analyze all of the economic impacts of a “critical habitat” designation (regardless of whether the impacts are co-extensive with, or cumulative of, other causes), or instead only those impacts for which “critical habitat” designation is a “but for” cause.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th… [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am by INFORRM
Supreme Court On 19 January 2011, the US Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of NASA v Nelson (09-530, see ScotUS Wiki) upholding NASA’s background checks for employees of companies working under contract. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Kimberly Tobritzhofer claims that her superiors at Sunrise of Roseville repeatedly told her not to report residents' increased occurrences of falling and concerns about skin care to state health officials or other employees. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm by Danielle Citron
The court rejected the government’s second claim by noting that unlike the defendant in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]