Search for: "Fix v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 10:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:42 am
Celestin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2019 Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
In Ortman v Miller, the court stated: “Resident” has no technical meaning, and no fixed meaning applicable to all cases, but rather it has many meanings, and is used in different and various senses, and it has received various interpretations by the courts. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
’ Davies v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
For example, in General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., GAO determined that the use of a Fixed Price Level of Effort contract type was inappropriate where the work was clearly defined, including both staffing and performance requirements, and there was no level of effort agreed upon, rather the hours set forth for each period were either a ceiling or estimate. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 12:30 am
SiegelIn Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
Massachusetts should fix that. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:10 pm
From Kamdem-Ouaffo, PhD v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
New York, 22-1130Issues: (1) Whether a law that prohibits owners from terminating a tenancy at the end of a fixed lease term, except on grounds outside the owner’s control, constitutes a physical taking; and (2) whether allegations that such a law conscripts private property for use as public housing stock, and thereby substantially reduces its value, state a regulatory takings claim. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
Congress could easily fix the problem by changing the "or" at the end of (C)(i) to "and. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:53 pm
Related Cases: Lagleva v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
” And the proposal stated the same caveat. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Cite to Holomaxx v. [read post]
