Search for: "GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC" Results 241 - 260 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118, 1127 (Ill. 2002) (applied to pharmacists); Hansen v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013). [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
First, because the Ninth Circuit already recognized that some class members in this case may not have a constitutional right to bond hearings, the class may no longer satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 That decision, issued by Judge Leonard Sand, held that because the named plaintiffs were not current employees, the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1319- 20 (Fed. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm by Charles Casper
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:49 am by Eva Arevuo
Wal-Mart Stores Inc) that has made class action against corporations arguably less effective. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Two significant examples include his authorship of the 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Two significant examples include his authorship of the 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Greg Mersol
 The Supreme Court emphasized that requirement only two years ago in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]