Search for: "GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF NON STOP PAY OUT"
Results 241 - 257
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Government ethics experts say that is an area that demands greater transparency for Californians to understand how their government awards contracts and opportunities, especially as Gov. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
This seems at best contrary to American constitutional jurisprudence requiring the consent of the governed and at worst destructive of the ends of government. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
The computer program is not an employee. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Importantly the Supreme Court held that: The court had the jurisdiction to make a de-indexing order against the non-party search engine Google. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
In 2000, the SEC stopped short of stating that it considered disclosure on a company’s website to be adequate public dissemination. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Trump’s political opponents as demons who were out to destroy not just Mr. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
He is supported by bipartisan House leadership in arguing the speech or debate clause of the Constitution bars the Justice Department from seeing the phone contents. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Consumers continue to pay the price for this intentional bait and switch. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:04 pm
The Department of Commerce also has the power to find that Chinese currency policy constitutes an unfair subsidy to Chinese exporters, and to assess countervailing duties on Chinese products. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
Carey: if Cox’s practice didn’t violate, what would? [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas Peters also was ordered to pay a $50,000 fine for his role in the corruption case. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:44 am
Eviction, will bankruptcy stop it? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle: (Ars… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 1:55 am
They work by defining what constitutes a “controlled” foreign company and when to attribute foreign income of these controlled companies to a domestic parent’s taxable income. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
If done in D.C., that would violate the District's prohibition on discrimination based on "personal appearance. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:29 pm
However, different types of economic and non-economic damages are available. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
