Search for: "GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF NON STOP PAY OUT" Results 241 - 257 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 2:57 pm by Mehmet Munur
Prior HIPAA regulations stated that a covered entity was non-compliant if it knew of a business associate’s activity that constituted a material breach of the associate’s contractual obligations and did not take reasonable steps to cure them. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
One wonders how much the government would have had to pay had these patients gotten worse without the treatment and had to be hospitalized.The case got thrown out because the qui tam plaintiffs couldn't even plead, let alone prove, causation. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 2:53 pm
Second was the court's admonition to the Palin family to stop their complaints to the government about Wooten. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 11:09 am
In other words, would copyright holders "opt-out" of the DMCA terms in order to avoid that liability? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle: (Ars… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Aviles-Colon, No. 05-1384, 05-2039, 05-2040 Conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin, cocaine, and marijuana at three drug points in Puerto Rico in violation of 21 U.S.C. sections 841(a) and 846 and for possession of firearms, is affirmed for two appellants and vacated for the third appellant where: 1) with respect to the two appellants there is no reversible error; and 2) with respect to the third appellant, the government failed to disclose exculpatory evidence material to… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
To register, send the following information to publications@nycap.rr.com Your name and e-mail address The name of your organizations and its mailing address Your telephone number The purchase order number for your order if your organization requires one Instructions concerning your registration will be then e-mailed to you.Topics covered in New York Public Personnel Law since April 1, 2008 [click on title to go to summary]A provisional employees right to a permanent appointment is… [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:27 pm
REMINDER: Commencing July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel Law NOTICE Effective July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel Law [Published since 2006, the quarterly index of topics covered and cases summarized since April 1, 2008 is set out below.] [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:33 pm
NOTICE Effective July 1, 2008, you must be a Registered Reader to access New York Public Personnel LawThe index of the subject of cases summarized since April 1, 2008 is set out below. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Loya, No. 07-2666 Denial of defendant's motion to suppress drug evidence seized from a valid vehicle stop is affirmed where: 1) under the totality of circumstances test, the trooper did not violate the Fourth Amendment when he expanded beyond the scope of the traffic stop, extended its duration by asking questions about contraband, and requested permission to search the vehicle; and 2) viewing defendant-driver and a passenger's interactions during the… [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
QUESTION: I have forms I have to fill out four times a year for the Government. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm by Robert Bennett
He also had to pay $6,225 in attorneys’ fees to the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the State Bar of Texas. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Well, they'll have a knock down, drag out preemption fight on their hands - but that's the subject for another post - if and when the day comes.What we're going to discuss now is the secret weapon in municipal tort litigation where, as in the nuisance cases, the government is suing in a quasi-parens patriae posture - that is, where it's suing over response costs created by purported injuries to its citizens rather than for damage to government property… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
Schaffer write that the decision illustrates the SEC's continuing difficulty in pursuing non-recurrent securities violations -- and the importance to defense counsel of considering the applicability of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]