Search for: "GROSS v GROSS"
Results 241 - 260
of 6,689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Pending Bills California’s financial climate risk disclosure bill, known as the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261), passed the State Senate on May 30 with a vote of 27-8 and is now before the state Assembly.[13] It would require covered businesses with annual gross revenues of more than $500 million to prepare and make public a “climate-related financial risk report disclosing the entity’s climate-related financial risk and measures adopted to reduce and adapt to… [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Employee claims he was terminated without cause In Maynard v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Employee claims he was terminated without cause In Maynard v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
The post TERRY JAMES v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
" (This, as it turns out, is among his least gross communications with her.) [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
The $90 million fee collected from Twitter for a few months of work on a single matter represented nearly 10% of Wachtell’s gross revenue in 2022, and over $1 million per Wachtell partner. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
The $90 million fee collected from Twitter for a few months of work on a single matter represented nearly 10% of Wachtell’s gross revenue in 2022, and over $1 million per Wachtell partner. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
In Tousi v Gaydukova [2023] EWHC 404 (Fam), an Iranian national and a Ukrainian national had an Iranian marriage in the Iranian embassy in Kyiv. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
Washington DC. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:44 am
The post TYBOIA BROWN v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Calling this putative disparity a “modest association” is a gross overstatement, and it is difficult to square the authors’ pronouncement of a “modest association” with a “very slight increased risk. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am
The IPCC concluded that W80’s belief that he was in imminent danger was honestly held, but unreasonable, and that W80 therefore had a case to answer for gross misconduct on the basis of the civil law test that any mistake of fact could only be relied upon if it was a reasonable mistake to have made. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In the upcoming Supreme Court case of Moore v. [read post]