Search for: "GROSS v GROSS" Results 241 - 260 of 6,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Pending Bills California’s financial climate risk disclosure bill, known as the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261), passed the State Senate on May 30 with a vote of 27-8 and is now before the state Assembly.[13] It would require covered businesses with annual gross revenues of more than $500 million to prepare and make public a “climate-related financial risk report disclosing the entity’s climate-related financial risk and measures adopted to reduce and adapt to… [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" (This, as it turns out, is among his least gross communications with her.) [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
The $90 million fee collected from Twitter for a few months of work on a single matter represented nearly 10% of Wachtell’s gross revenue in 2022, and over $1 million per Wachtell partner. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:32 am
The $90 million fee collected from Twitter for a few months of work on a single matter represented nearly 10% of Wachtell’s gross revenue in 2022, and over $1 million per Wachtell partner. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:27 am by Emma Kent
In Tousi v Gaydukova [2023] EWHC 404 (Fam), an Iranian national and a Ukrainian national had an Iranian marriage in the Iranian embassy in Kyiv. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
Calling this putative disparity a “modest association” is a gross overstatement, and it is difficult to square the authors’ pronouncement of a “modest association” with a “very slight increased risk. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am by Matrix Law
The IPCC concluded that W80’s belief that he was in imminent danger was honestly held, but unreasonable, and that W80 therefore had a case to answer for gross misconduct on the basis of the civil law test that any mistake of fact could only be relied upon if it was a reasonable mistake to have made. [read post]