Search for: "Garland v. Downes"
Results 241 - 260
of 315
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
Mark Janus, et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:19 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [Parhat v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:22 am
” Briefly: Commentary on this week’s supplemental briefs in Zubik v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
Circuit, Garland joined that court’s opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
Of course, if Merrick Garland were confirmed, it would (absent recusals) end the risk of such stalemates, but that is not the only advantage of his joining the Court: during Senate courtesy calls this week, Garland revealed that, if confirmed, he would become the first male Justice to wear a jabot. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am
” On Wednesday, the Court issued its decision in Luis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This precise issue was addressed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
However, in Parhat v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:56 am
However, in Parhat v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:53 pm
In Nexion Health at Garland, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
– Pugh v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
ISIS, however, doubled down on its claim, announcing that it has 71 trained fighters in 15 different U.S. states. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:43 am
" is the question posed by the title of a fascinating interdisciplinary conference that is coming up down towards the bottom left corner of the British Isles in the lovely and ancient city of Exeter. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:06 pm
Compare Hammer v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 5:00 am
Circuit held an en banc review of American Meat Institute v. [read post]
