Search for: "General Corporation v. General Motors Corporation" Results 241 - 260 of 863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon)   Colombia… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
The Corporate Abuse at the Heart of Concepcion The Concepcion case involves the widespread corporate practice of using standard-form contracts to ban class actions. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 3:48 pm by Brendan Kevenides
 Authority for the use of the 710 instruction comes from the Supreme Court of California in Cucinella v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:11 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
-market vehicles sold by Toyota, Honda, Mazda, BMW, Nissan and General Motors to the recall list for housing faulty Takata airbags. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
General Foam Plastics Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court Kansas: Third Party infringers have no standing to challenge assignment: KMMentor, LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm by Andrew Hamm
State courts’ general jurisdiction over out-of-state businesses In Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Global Global – General Corporate business leaders: Want to create value from your IP? [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
AUTO – GRAVES AMENDMENT – RENTED TRUCK – QUESTION OF FACT ON RENTER'S NEGLIGENCE PRECLUDES SUMMARY JUDGMENT Ballatore v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report)  District Court S D California: Certificates of correction can overreach: Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:34 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  Tata Motors is part of the Tata Group, one of the world’s largest corporate conglomerates, which maintains subsidiaries in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s like saying that, because Ford Motor Co. has published corporate histories in its name, sponsors Masterpiece Theater, and creates extensive social media content, “Ford Motor Company” is now a title for Rogers purposes, or that the existence of The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History or The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codemakes those entities into titles for Rogers purposes. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:45 am
Plaintiffs, a group of car dealers and manufacturers including DaimlerChrysler and the General Motors Corporation, alleged in their complaint that Vermont's proposed regulations were pre-empted by the federal Clean Air Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, and sought an injunction barring the state from implementation of the proposed regulations. [read post]