Search for: "General Foods Corp. v. General Foods, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2022, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” And in Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc. (80 NY2d 124 [1992]), the Court addressed the dichotomy under New York law of illegality based upon “malum in se, or evil in itself,” and “malum prohibitum,” or evil merely because it is prohibited. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Haldex Brake Products Corp (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct pleading must allege how examiner would have used undisclosed information: SynQor, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Catskill Mountain Mechanical Corp. and its alter ego, Plant Maintenance Services, Inc. (3-CA-26213; 352 NLRB No. 101) West Coxsackie, NY June 30, 2008. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam… [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
General Foods Corp. (1983) 35 Cal.3d 197, 211.) .... [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Stremicks Heritage Foods LLC (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Delay seeking transfer of venue trumps other convenience factors: eTool Development, Inc. et al v. [read post]