Search for: "Generes v. Campbell" Results 241 - 260 of 1,355
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Gottardi, Peck and Company Barristers General Editors: Brian H. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
It is the first decision of this nature to consider the effect of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 9 July 2019 Sharp P and Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Yaxley-Lennon [2019] EWHC 1791 (QB). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This debate encompasses an extraordinarily broad range of ideas and viewpoints and generates a level of passion and intensity the likes of which have rarely been seen. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
If a domain name contains only generic or descriptive words, then the complainant is not likely to prevail. [read post]
14 May 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Responding to a question about when investors might hear about the Costco U.S. negotiations, Campbell spoke about the companies’ relationship, stressed that “I don’t think we’ve said anything about any ongoing discussions we’re having with Costco,” and then said that AmEx works with its partners generally every day to “evolve the relationship to make it better. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Scotland In the case of Campbell v Dugdale [2019] ScotSC 32 the Sheriff’s Court dismissed a libel action against MSP Kezia Dugdale over an allegation that blogger Stuart Campbell had posted “homophobic tweets”. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Quarles v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Kirksey is cited in the following article: Charles Calleros & Val Ricks, Kirksey v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm by Shahram Miri
There is generally no geographical limitation for a participant in litigation. [read post]