Search for: "Gillett v. Gillett" Results 241 - 260 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am by Adam Wagner
Updated – Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 - Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal to  unanimously hold that the defence of fair comment should be open to a booking agent which said on its website that a Motown tribute band, the Gillettes, were “unprofessional”. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
 Fellow Kat Neil Wilkof writes on IP Finance on the so-far unsuccessful exercise in "reverse innovation" in the Tata Nano car, contrasting it with Gillette's frugal innovation in the Gillette Guard double-edged razor for the Indian market. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:07 am
Gillett [“Owners”] had an indirect ownership of 50% each. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued August 4, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rice v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
The Gillettes, Mr Joseph and two others, sued for libel. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:15 am by VMaryAbraham
v=uLTIowBF0kE In response to Gillette: www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:08 am by INFORRM
As we mentioned on 11 June 2010, Associated Newspapers Limited and Times Newspapers Limited sought permission to intervene in the forthcoming Supreme Court fair comment appeal of Spiller v Joseph (involving the Motown tribute band, the “Gillettes”, pictured right). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued June 25, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Churchill v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:08 am by INFORRM
 The claim was brought by the members of the trio, the Gillettes concerning an allegation that they were “not professional enough to feature in our portfolio”. [read post]