Search for: "Givens v. Clarke" Results 241 - 260 of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
I think I found it (finally) in last month's decision by the Ninth Circuit in Moss v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:33 am
First, the criminal case: Mclellan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
One answer can be found in a recent case, Walker v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
That problem is particularly acute when a speech (given and intended to be viewed and heard, and not read) is turned into a text document. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am by Raj Desai, Matrix
Comment The clean bill of health given to the legality of the sponsor licensing scheme may well come as a disappointment to sponsoring institutions and sponsored applicants alike, both of which will now remain subject to a regulatory system built entirely on the Secretary of State’s published sponsor guidance. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:52 am
From his conviction for which he received a sentence of twenty-three years' incarceration, Walker appeals, urging two points of error, both related to the status of Johnson and Clark as accomplices.Walker v. [read post]