Search for: "Givens v. Givens" Results 241 - 260 of 75,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 6:39 am by sustainabilitypepper
The recent economic meltdown may have given some businesses and governments pause in their efforts to reduce their carbon footprints. [read post]
5 May 2015, 10:17 pm
Their Given Name Homosexuals Their, Alis Gay, filed May (not April) 1 in the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:44 am by traceydennis
Bank of Scotland v Pereira and others [2011] EWCA Civ 241; [2011] WLR (D) 79 “A party against whom a judgment in default of appearance had been given was entitled to apply to set aside that decision, if she met the three conditions in CPR r 39.3, and could seek to appeal against the default judgment under CPR Pt 52 whether or not she could comply with the rule 39.3 conditions. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:03 am by snahmod
Background On November 9, 2015, the Supreme Court handed down Mullinex v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:35 am
Regina (Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council Queen’s Bench Division “Statutory provisions entitling interested persons to inspect and copy accounts of a local authority and all books, deeds, contracts, bills, vouchers and receipts relating to them, were to be given a broad interpretation in respect of the phrases, ‘accounts to be audited’ and ‘relating to’. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:22 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and Another Court of Appeal “Information supplied by applicants for animal experiment licences was exempt from disclosure under freedom of information provisions if the official in possession of the information knew or had reasonable grounds for believing that it was given in confidence. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:03 am by snahmod
Background On November 9, 2015, the Supreme Court handed down Mullinex v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:53 am
Regina (Prudential plc and Another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax Queen's Bench Division "Rather than apply legal advice privilege to a wider range of professionals than lawyers, its application to advice given by lawyers should be restricted, on a review of the policy and the public-interest considerations that underlay legal professional privilege. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:23 am
Angel & Co (a firm) v Jenkins O'Dowd & Barth (a firm) [2009] EWHC 46 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 9 “When ordering summary enforcement of undertakings given by solicitors to redeem or discharge existing mortgages and charges over property being sold, the court was not required to conduct an inquiry to examine what would have happened [...] [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:11 am
Employee charging employer did not appoint him because of age required to show that the employer's reasons given for rejecting him were pretextualSaia v Suffolk County Community College, 2009 NY Slip Op 05851, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Appellate Division dismissed Robert Saia's appeal in which he sought to recover damages for alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of age in violation of Executive Law §296, the State's Human… [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:25 pm by Howard Wasserman
OK, if Town of Greece did not get me too worked up, Tuesday's decision in Wood v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:50 am
Given the public choice considerations, Larry Ribstein is not sure there are any scenarios in which mutual fund investors as a group are really going to win. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:30 am
S-H v Kingston upon Hull City Council and another [2008] EWCA Civ 493; [2008] WLR (D) 154 “When deciding whether to grant leave to a parent to apply for revocation of an order placing a child for adoption, the court should ask itself the question whether, in all the circumstances, including the parent's prospect of success in securing revocation and the child's interests, leave should be given. [read post]