Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 3:51 pm
The EEOC filed two motions relative to the employer’s affirmative defense based on the Commission’s alleged failure to conciliate, including: (1) for partial summary judgment on the issue of pre-suit conciliation and (2) a motion to strike portions of Dimensions’ response in opposition to the EEOC’s summary judgment motion. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am
Greene (Apr. 5, 2022) Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Apr. 11, 2022) Motion to Enforce Subpoena to Rep. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:37 am
Instead, the government promises to integrate pay equity more closely with the collective bargaining process in order to "ensure that the employer and bargaining agents are jointly responsible and accountable for negotiating salaries that are fair and equitable to all employees. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:04 pm
Virginia, has not yet ruled whether Rule 15 depositions should be ordered in the case against William Jefferson, in spite of opposition by the government. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
Before they left, however, they were both vocal in their opposition to the direction in which Bishop Lawrence was going, and differed publicly with St. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
On August 27, 2012 the patent proprietor filed written observations in response to submissions of the opponent. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:37 am
The tendered reply brief here was only six pages long, arrived the next business day after the government’s opposition, and to my eyes appears to exclusively respond to matters in the government’s opposition, and not simply to repeat stuff already covered in the petition. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:47 pm
In support of the petition, and in opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners had asserted that they were entitled to an appraisal pursuant to section 623 because the amendment adversely altered their redemption and voting rights under Business Corporation Law § 806(b)(6)(B) and (D). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
A beautiful turn of phrase (but see my other concerns), Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion, colloquially stated as “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction and opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss January 5, 2018. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:29 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Hyemin Han shared Trump’s response to the Justice Department’s motion for partial stay of U.S District Judge Aileen Cannon's order enjoining the government from using the materials seized at Mar-a-Lago for criminal investigative purposes. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 6:28 pm
In response, AHF filed this new complaint and petition. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
She made such a request in her opposition brief and, later, in a post-judgment motion. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:02 am
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari Monday in the case of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the younger of the two brothers responsible for the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Then he challenged Labour — and, in an unprecedented move, other opposition parties — to table a no-confidence motion for a vote the next day. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
The result was that an agency ostensibly charged with the responsibility of looking out for the interests of shareholders did the opposite. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
We are not asking companies to file lawsuits in opposition to NSLs the way our clients did. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
It is a risky strategy, as it would first give the opposition 14 days to form a national unity government. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Respondent's motion to reconsider was denied. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
In her accompanying opinion, Judge Kessler acknowledges that no court has ever ordered the disclosure of classified information over the government’s opposition in any case involving Guantanamo detainees, but declares that the courts have the discretion and the responsibility to do so where warranted. [read post]
