Search for: "Grant v. Hobbs" Results 241 - 260 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
Sebelius, 11-83, which had been relisted once, moves into the “hold” column awaiting decision in the newly granted Salazar v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-654Issue: Whether the conspiracy offense proscribed in the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am by Amy Howe
  At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the grant in Armstong v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:22 am by Mack Sperling
A motion on similar facts was denied last week in the case of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague; (2) whether Hobbs Act robbery is a “crime of violence” as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
Also, courts are concerned about granting injunctions that would affect speech, as with Wal*ocaust. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The Environmental Law Prof Blog speculates on the Court’s reasons for granting certiorari in Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Turner, No. 03-2608 Conviction and sentence for several Hobbs Act and firearms offenses based upon an attempt to rob an armored car facility are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) a Hobbs Act conspiracy is not a "crime of violence" for purposes of a charge for use of a weapon during a crime of violence; 2) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act; 3) the district court improperly instructed the… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  More on that grant can be found here. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am by Lyle Denniston
Hobbs (10-9647); the Court granted review of the two separately, but said that it will hear oral arguments in them back-to-back. [read post]