Search for: "Green v. White" Results 241 - 260 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 11:04 pm by Steve Baird
After more than a little digging online, it appears MS + green/white trade dress = Missouri Southern. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Many lawful permanent residents (LPRs)—that is, aliens with green cards—were denied entry to the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
  Jeff Fisher attributes to him the same view expressed by Justice Byron White in 1968 that the Sixth Amendment is “reluctan[t] to entrust the plenary powers of life and liberty of the citizen to one judge or to a group of judges” (Duncan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am by Bill Otis
McHugh is a "friend of white supremacists" is true, but nothing in her questions to me gave me any reason to believe she is a racist. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Justice Green: "...challenged the Regulations upon the basis of international trade mark and health law, EU law, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Convention of Human Rights, and the domestic common law. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Where this case differs is that the IP Adjudicator had to consider an additional factor in the mark-similarity assessment: colour.This is because, besides the alleged similarity in the layouts, Starbucks argued that Morinaga’s prospective use of the application mark in a green, white, and black colour combination would render the marks similar. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This matter arose following the respondent’s late husband developing vibration white finger whilst employed by the National Coal Board. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Our analysis focused on the global need to decrease reliance on Russian oil and gas and to accelerate the transition to green energy. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
White that, under the test for allied offenses in State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Eric Osterberg
The idea of a floral pattern depicting bouquets and branches is not protectible, and C30020 has elements that are not protectible, for example the combination of open flowers and closed buds in a single bouquet or the green color of stems and leaves. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm by Eric Osterberg
The idea of a floral pattern depicting bouquets and branches is not protectible, and C30020 has elements that are not protectible, for example the combination of open flowers and closed buds in a single bouquet or the green color of stems and leaves. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
White     Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 09a0064n.06  USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
White     Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 09a0064n.06  USA v. [read post]