Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 241 - 260 of 2,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by Steven Boutwell
She also indicated that EPA was required to address whether GHGs endanger public health and welfare pursuant to the United States Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by Andrew Hamm
The greenhouse gas cases (12-1146, 12-1248, 12-1254, 12-1268, 12-1269, 12-1272) and Abramski v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
The reverberations of the Supreme Court’s April 2, 2007 ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 1:19 pm
Michigan and Garcetti v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:32 am by admin
—The Environmental Protection Agency Dec. 9 sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review a final rule that would ensure that requirements for greenhouse gas emissions sources to obtain operating permits under… Read this entire article for free, simply activate your free 15 day trial access to World Climate Change Report now. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:37 am by stu@crimapp.com
We are in agreement that there is a tension between the Porter ruling and the Court’s other recent per curiam ruling in Bobby v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:11 am
Today's New York Times urges the Supreme Court to force the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:55 am
Updating this ILB entry from Feb. 26 about the case of Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:56 am
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed on March 10 a comprehensive national registry of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:16 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse reports here on the Court's ruling that the EPA has the power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
It’s worth noting that while I am very critical of plans to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, I believe such regulation is effectively compelled by the Supreme Court’s Massachusetts v. [read post]