Search for: "HOGAN v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
That month, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated Safe Harbor as a data transfer mechanism in the case Schrems v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
And in Sullivan v Boylan [2013] IEHC 104 (12 March 2013) Hogan J awarded €15,000 in general damages, and €7,500 in exemplary damages, for infringement of the plaintiff’s constitutional right to privacy. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
Winfried Tilmann of Hogan Lovells which suggests that it might be possible for the UK, post-Brexit, to nevertheless be involved in the Unitary Patent (European Patent with Unitary Effect or EPUE) and Unified Patent Court (UPC). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
Hogan, C.A. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/k2wjCVWDWj -> Oracle v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Link to US Scotus opinion on enhanced damages in patent cases , Halo v Pulse https://t.co/vpXI1MQmc4 -> Cable companies launch court battle against 'free TV' Android box vendors https://t.co/nXbDK1iEx6 -> Courtroom to riches? [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am
United States Gawker Media has filed for bankruptcy after losing the Hulk Hogan invasion-of-privacy case. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
That happened in North Carolina, where the state’s cyberbullying law was considered in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:09 am
This is less time than allowed by some Member States at present. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
V. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:21 am
In Hogan v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:58 am
” See Bollea v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:30 pm
On Monday, May 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its highly anticipated opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:18 am
Joined by Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Supp. 445, 448 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (under New York law, continued employment for a “substantial period” following the execution of the agreement is sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant); Hogan v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Supp. 445, 448 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (under New York law, continued employment for a “substantial period” following the execution of the agreement is sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant); Hogan v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
Anti-Bribery Study: 600 CCOs Weigh In I couldn’t resist blogging about this new Hogan Lovells’ study on anti-bribery & corruption because I just love the microsite that the firm created to house the thing. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
Anti-Bribery Study: 600 CCOs Weigh In I couldn’t resist blogging about this new Hogan Lovells’ study on anti-bribery & corruption because I just love the microsite that the firm created to house the thing. [read post]
