Search for: "HOLDING v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 69,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 2:57 pm
United States, agreeing to review the decision by the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 8:29 am
The case, Wittman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 12:29 pm
In Gamble v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am
Next Monday the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:00 am
Earlier this month, the Colorado Supreme Court invalidated two municipalities’ bans on hydraulic fracturing, holding that the local ordinances instituting the bans were preempted by state law. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:37 am
Harris and Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:39 am
" United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
The Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:11 pm
Hat tip to Sarah Johnson, who forwarded info about State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejecting the district court’s claim construction and holding that Hong Kong uCloudlink Network (uCloudlink) was entitled to summary judgment of non-infringement (SIMO Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
In Parrish v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
In an opinion today in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
The post Vacatur and United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
In MacDonald v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
United States is exciting because it holds that government use of cell site data to determine a defendant’s location over a period of seven days is a search, requiring probable cause and a warrant. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
On April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Welch v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- Last week, we provided a preview of the Supreme Court case Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:20 am
The issue is "Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law... [read post]