Search for: "HOLIDAY V. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 11:53 am
Day, a United States Federal holiday.BTW, that's called Monday in Arizona. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:11 am
Cosa v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:00 am
In Schwartzman v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
The letter of dismissal stated that payment would be made of statutory redundancy pay, holiday pay, and an ‘ex gratia’ payment of a sum equivalent to 3 months’ gross salary. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:32 am
Although in the middle of the Easter holiday (at least for some), I find it is worth briefly reporting on the opinion of the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry and McCreary County v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:07 am
During the landmark case, Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 12:36 pm
Following years of debate and state tax laws that pushed the limits on how to view physical presence, South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
In the case of Navarette v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
See Greenwood v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
The Court, in the opinion Boynton v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am
Lyle Denniston provides a general overview of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Just before the holidays last year, the Federal Court of Appeal released its decision in Red Label Vacations Inc v 411 Travel Buys Limited 2015 FCA 290. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
(Furia v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
In an attempt to learn more about the legal aspects of The Gunpowder Plot, I came across a post from Lawfare, a blog on national security issues, that describes the commemoration as “one of the few–if not the only–holidays that mark the failure of non-state actors to bring down the symbols of state regimes. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 2:47 pm
Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:22 pm
§ 28-1381 Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
The issue that will be argued in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:04 am
But the world seems to have overlooked the implications of Thomson v. [read post]
