Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL V. UNITED STATES " Results 241 - 260 of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
  International Tax Law International tax law consists mostly of bilateral income tax treaties concluded between sovereign states. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm by Barry Sookman
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
He also said that the United States Marshals Service denied his request this year for a hernia operation, saying not unless the situation was life-threatening. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
We believe this action could be a model for future investor claims outside the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
At the end the case was settled after mediation. *** *** Target is a “big box store” with over 1,700 retail locations throughout the United States, selling various products including home decor. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
NSSTA's backward step: Re-focus on "protecting, preserving and promoting" structured settlement laws already enacted in the United States Internal Revenue Code and 47 state structured settlement protection statutes; Consolidate and transition NSSTA's administrative, financial and political strengths. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
If it does not “ ‘give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice’ ” of its scope, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 25-26 February 2015. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-582, is likely being held for United States v. [read post]
Swaroop claims the plaintiffs did not “exhaust domestic remedies,” which would mean mitigation measures and damages received from the plaintiffs’ home state of Portugal, before seeking international remedies. [read post]