Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US " Results 241 - 260 of 1,663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
The central focus of plaintiffs' complaints is that defendants were aware of dangers associated with lead-and by extension, with the dangers of including it in paint intended to be used in homes and businesses-and failed to warn of those dangers. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
The slogan “The chair that grows with the child” has been used in the marketing of the Tripp Trapp chair since the 1980s. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
The first was a mock International IP arbitration. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
It is the great producer of illusion and a mirror on the affectations of the world expressed as ideology in its most refined that obscures  its application in its home territories. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  We’d pass it along, except it includes internal LCJ business as well. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
It then considers the rise of CSR regulatory regimes as privatized law making that uses the mechanisms of contract to regulate conduct throughout a production chain. [read post]