Search for: "Ha v. Board of Parole" Results 241 - 260 of 660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am by Anita Davies
The use of the s 255 power is not reviewed by the Parole Board. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 4:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Certainly, the Board has the right and obligation to consider the severity of the crime. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm by Leiza Dolghih
Parel, the Eighth Court of Appeals held that a letter to a parole board from a client’s attorney did not arise from “the sale of goods, services or insurance product. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
The judgment has required the Parole Board to change fundamentally the way it sees oral hearings. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 11:14 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Such a review, a Vinter review, differs from the review by the Parole Board currently required in England and Wales after an offender has served a minimum period set by the sentencing court, a post-tariff review. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:48 am by Laura Sandwell
The appellant applied for judicial review of the decision, arguing that his rights under ECHR, art 5(4) were breached by recalling him to prison without giving him access to a Parole Board. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders of State of N.Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Notwithstanding numerous amendments to the statute since Doe v Pataki, the Court of Appeals has consistently held that SORA, " is not a penal statute and the registration requirement is not a criminal sentence. [read post]