Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
/**/ R (A) v Croydon & R (M) v Lambeth UKSC [2009] 8 This was an appeal heard by the House of Lords over the course of four days in July, but with judgment delivered by the new Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
OMH, Lambert claimed, (1) found her to be her eligible for FMLA benefits on February 1995 but (2) terminated her in March 1995.The court never reached the merits of Lambert’s allegations, holding that [s]ince Lambert’s FMLA claim against the Office of Mental Health is predicated on a request for leave involving her own health condition (in contrast, for example, to a request for leave for the birth of a child), it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment.The court cited Hale… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am
Lord Phillips and Lady Hale, considered similar questions in relation to the meaning of ‘benefit’ in confiscation cases (albeit in relation to the preceding statutory regime under Criminal Justice Act 1988) relatively recently as Law Lords in CPS v Jennings [2008] UKHL 29. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:18 am
The post Case Preview: Richardson & Anor v DPP appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Supreme Court yesterday granted review in Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:41 pm
In Bull v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
In Hale v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
This was a deliberate policy choice to make the law respond to current needs: see per Baroness Hale at [60]. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:49 pm
The National Law Journal features the Smith v. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The phrase marriage of convenience is “a term of art” in Lady Hale’s analysis. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
