Search for: "Harms v. Bennett"
Results 241 - 260
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:11 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
A review of the record did not reveal that the child would suffer irreparable loss of status or other physical or emotional harm if a genetic marker test were ordered. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
New research indicates that human moderators can be an effective way to reduce and control harmful online content. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
From today's Ninth Circuit decision in Yim v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
The orthodox U.S. constitutional response to harmful speech, including false speech, is counterspeech. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
Providing inaccurate legal advice harms clients and places the lawyer at risk of liability for malpractice. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
See Bennett v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm
Researchers have revealed the specific harms and disproportionate negative impacts surveillance and algorithmic tools can have on disabled people in education, the legal system, health care and the workplace. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Following the Information Commissioner’s Order to release the information, the BBC appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber), arguing that disclosure would also “be likely to harm the commercial interests of MTM”. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Alston, No. 06-1559 Conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon after the district court precluded defendant from offering a justification defense is affirmed where defendant did not present evidence that: 1) he was under a present threat of death or bodily harm; 2) there was a direct causal relationship between the criminal act and the avoidance of the threatened harm; or that 3) he had no reasonable legal alternative. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
However, the “deliberately false case as to serious harm” advanced by Dr Wright until days before trial meant that he was awarded only nominal damages of £1 [143-4]. [read post]
