Search for: "Harms v. United States of America" Results 241 - 260 of 1,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2019, 7:37 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  See, e.g., Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., Brief amici curiae of Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, et al., Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and Brief amici curiae of National Association of Convenience Stores, et al. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
The United States of America (‘US’), one of the treaty’s signatories, has adopted Article 1(A) of the Convention without any substantial reservation, understanding or declaration (‘RUDs’). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It is heartening to see the likes of the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Planned Parenthood taking a stand against extreme religious liberty. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
Jason Getsy (and remember, it's not too late to write Governor Strickland and urge him to commute Getsy's death sentence) or United States of America v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Rather, the justices viewed the case as an opportunity to provide needed clarification of existing doctrine.The Smith majority (not Scalia by himself) described the lynchpin in the system that has made the United States a haven for believers but also a safe place where believers do not have a right to harm others, as it was first stated in Reynolds:Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary because of his religious belief? [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:58 am by Charles Sartain
Co. a United States District Court considered the circumstances under which a lessor can withold its consent to assign an oil and gas lease. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Morales-Santana, the Court said “yes,” although it stopped short of providing a remedy that for the unconstitutional harm it identified.Luis Ramón Morales-Santana was born in the Dominican Republic but has lived in the United States since he was 13. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am by Lauren Bateman
 In any event, argues the United States, habeas is an inappropriate mechanism for attacking such conditions. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]