Search for: "Harris v. Department of Corrections"
Results 241 - 260
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm
And: The state Corrections Department purchased supplies of the lethal drugs from Cardinal Health, an Ohio-based wholesale drug supplier. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
Similarly, the fact that anesthesia is in short supply worldwide does not indicate that the Arkansas Department of Correction is in short supply of the drug. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban) (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v G (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v M (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 October 6, 2011 Supreme Court: Scottish prosecutions based on questioning by police pre-detention without access to lawyer not ECHR breach. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
Harris v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:14 pm
App. 2011); see also Napper, 322 S.W.3d at 242 (citing Estrada v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
California Department Mental Health, 2011 U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:35 am
In Meza v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
") AC32409 - Commissioner of Correction v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:18 am
First the good: State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
Harris v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Santoro v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton is correct in noting that, although the standard of proof does not depart from that of clear and convincing evidence, a party challenging validity shoulders an enhanced burden if the invalidity argument relies on the same prior art considered during examination by the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:20 am
Saravia testified this was not correct as he was `in the middle of [his] engineering degree’ and was passing all of his classes. . . . [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Harris’ claims. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
The unreported decision is Cole v. [read post]
