Search for: "Harris v. Doe et al"
Results 241 - 260
of 308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2010, 1:49 pm
If the motion is granted, the court of appeals shall reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.MARIA DEL CARMEN GUILBOT SERROS DE GONZALEZ, ET AL. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Neuschatz et al., The Effects of Accomplice Witnesses and Jail-house Informants on Jury Decision Making, 32 Law & Hum. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
One Technologies, L.P., et al., No. 17-10883 (5th Cir., November 28, 2018), a customer, Forby, filed a putative class action lawsuit against a company, One Technologies (“One Tech”), in an Illinois state court. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
CMP et al. had no First Amendment right to break the laws they broke. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
Harrisongs Music et al, 420 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
The subsequent case of Harris Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:09 pm
In the second case, Mohamad, et al., v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance) Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am
Pamilar, et al. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Maersk (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court S D Texas: Continuing use of accused products sold prior to notice of patent is not direct infringement sufficient to support claim of indirect infringement: Tesco v Weatherford (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Enhanced damages & attorney’s fees: Plaintiff awarded $5 million in fees, $3 million in expert expenses, and treble damages as a result of litigation misconduct by defendant: ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
KEITH LOWELL, ET AL. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
” Garrou v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
State of California, et al., U.S. [read post]
