Search for: "Heard v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 18,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 10:02 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Mehta, Kaitlyn Box, Mar. 11, 2024 "On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
On 5 March 2024, HHJ Lewis heard applications to strike out and to amend and an application on preliminary issues in Francis v Burston QB-2020-000831. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by Stuart Kaplow
In future blogs, we will post about the legal challenges to the Final Rule, including the case already filed by ten states in federal court in the 11th Circuit where West Virginia is the lead plaintiff (.. déjà vu West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:00 am by Richard H. Hughes IV
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments in Braidwood v Becerra, a case challenging the constitutionality of the ACA requirement that most forms of private health coverage include certain recommended preventive services. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
” Since the officers failed to give proper notice of their “purpose” prior to entering the apartment, the AD1 thought the entry was unlawful, and that the New York County Supreme Court should have granted SJ’s motion to suppress the evidence retrieved and that the conviction thus needed to be reversed.That had to be suppressing.# # #DECISIONPeople v Jones [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Samuel Bray
And there are other pressures toward abstraction that apply in other cases, such as state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:31 am by Heather Douglas
The matter was heard by a judge and a jury. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am by David Super
”       To read this, one might think that the justices have never heard of a certain institution empowered to resolve such disagreements among states’ adjudications of federal questions. [read post]