Search for: "Held v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 241 - 260 of 438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2016, 8:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Although affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment to an employer in a suit brought by a blind African-American Health and Human Services employee, the D.C. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:30 am
Department of Health and Human Services, Sylvia Burwell, and that is why she is listed as the defendant in the case that subsequently went before a federal judge.The first decision for that federal judge was whether or how much to defer to the HHS Appeals Council. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
House of Representatives “has standing to pursue its allegations that the Secretaries of Health and Human Services and of the Treasury violated Article I, § 9, cl. 7 of the Constitution when they spent public monies that were not appropriated by the Congress. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm by Mark Walsh
Top White House aides and two secretaries of the Department of Health and Human Services have attended the Court’s ACA-related cases in recent years. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In a 6-2 opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court held in Gobeille that ERISA Section 514 preempts Vermont’s requirement that health insurers and other health benefit payers report health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for inclusion in an all-inclusive health care data base. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Dep’t of Health & Human Services 15-543Issue: (1) Whether the Affordable Care Act’s tax on going without health insurance is a “Bill[] for raising Revenue” to which the Origination Clause applies; and (2) whether the Senate's gut-and-replace procedure was a constitutionally valid “amend [ment]” pursuant to the Origination Clause. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) now accepts that long periods in segregation are not conducive to prisoner health or correctional goals—these facts are not in dispute. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), the Supreme Court held that a regulation of Health and Human Services could not force Hobby Lobby to pay for abortifacients to give to its employees. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  David Fontaine is Executive Vice President, Chief Legal & Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of Altegrity, a privately held company that among other entities, owns Kroll’s data breach response services. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
  The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., (2015) No. 14-114. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am by Jon Gelman
If a State chooses not to follow the directive in Section 18031 to establish an Exchange, the Act tells the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish “such Exchange. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court will, however, order a preliminary injunction to require Defendants Sylvia Matthews Burwell, Yvette Roubideaux, John Hubbard, Jr., and Frank Dayish (collectively, “the Defendants”), to fund the Navajo Health Foundation—Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc., according to the terms of: (i) the Annual Funding Agreement Between Navajo Health Foundation /Sage Memorial Hospital and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human… [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
That meant that the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), using Section 1321 of the ACA, established exchanges in the remaining states. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm by Giles Peaker
Alternatively, Article 8 rights were engaged, as the tenants would be unable to remain in their existing accommodation, as per Lord Dyson (MR) in R (JS) v Secretary of Sta [read post]