Search for: "Hernandez v. New York" Results 241 - 260 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
On November 12, 2002, Florencio Hernandez, a 63 year old retired maintenance man, was walking home in New York City. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:35 am
"We urged a different interpretation, but her decision was in conformity with what other courts were doing," said Robert Isseks, a New York attorney who represented the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
Hernandez, 463, 4905/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 3591; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Hernandez, respondent NEW YORK COUNTYCivil PracticeWhile New York May Be Proper Forum, England More Convenient, Appropriate One Sears Tooth v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Before explaining the court's analysis, I can't refrain - as a New Yorker - from pointing out that this beautifully and clearly written opinion by Justice Mark Cady stands as a strong rebuke to the bizarre plurality opinion produced by Judge Robert Smith of the New York Court of Appeals in the 2006 ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
The New York Court of Appeals will finally weigh in on the question of legal recognition by New York of same-sex marriages contracted elsewhere. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
  Same-sex couples cannot GET married in New York (see Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
Hernandez, 5162, 1921/04, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 590; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:37 pm
Although New York's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals, found there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
" He also pointed out that although the Court of Appeals had ruled in 2006 in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
This order was challenged in the courts on the ground that it was inconsistent with the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
  The argument is illogical on its face, but has been accepted by quite a few state courts, including -- to the utter shame ofmy home state -- the abysmally reasoned decision by the New York Court of Appeals from two years ago. [read post]