Search for: "Hill v. Day" Results 241 - 260 of 2,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by Mike
Hines began to work for the PUC where she continues to work to this day. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Supp. 2d 233, 253 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) and as connoting a racial meaning, see Hill v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:58 am by Howard Friedman
Taconic Hills Central School (Docket No. 12-1479). [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:47 pm
The Supreme Court's decision last year in Ledbetter v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am by Suzanne Ito
Tomorrow, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Europe's top human rights court based in Strasbourg, France, will hear arguments in El-Masri v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
 The tread on boots defendant was wearing on the day of his arrest resembled footprints made in the sand outside the victim's apartment.People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Hill, Ethan Blevins urges the court to review Elster v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:52 am by Eugene Volokh
He then intervened to unseal the case, and Monday Tax Court Judge Patrick DeAlmeida agreed (Hill v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Under such circumstances, the respondents acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within a reasonable time after the expiration of the 90-day statutory period (see Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d 1064, 1066; Matter of Gershanow v Town of Clarkstown, 88 AD3d 879, 880; Matter of Gelish v Dix Hills Water Dist., 58 AD3d 841, 842; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Under such circumstances, the respondents acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within a reasonable time after the expiration of the 90-day statutory period (see Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d 1064, 1066; Matter of Gershanow v Town of Clarkstown, 88 AD3d 879, 880; Matter of Gelish v Dix Hills Water Dist., 58 AD3d 841, 842; cf. [read post]