Search for: "Hoffman v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
On its own, this comment would seemingly mean that any death, no matter how remote in time, would potentially engage the procedural limbs of article 2; to borrow Lord Hoffman’s example from Re McKerr [67], the deaths of the Princes in the Tower could require a state-instigated, effective and independent investigation. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:18 am
United States (06-1509), Crawford v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 9:02 am
IFor publication opinions today (4): In United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 6:25 am by Robert Kreisman
About 700 million passengers a year in the United States are moved about by the 29,000 motorcoaches that transports them. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Appellants asserted that the United Kingdom’s actions in Iraq were unlawful and that they were thus justified in attempting to prevent them by the use of reasonable force. [read post]