Search for: "House v. USA" Results 241 - 260 of 1,233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
House of Representatives v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am by Marty Lederman
Mazars USA, No. 19A545, involves a subpoena the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform issued to Mazars back in April. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Roberts Jr. to put a hold on an appeals court decision that said the House Oversight and Reform Committee was within its rights to subpoena the information from Trump’s longtime accounting firm Mazars USA. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the House Oversight Committee case (Trump v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald argues that Comcast v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
.: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on reauthorizing the USA Freedom Act of 2015. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
House of Representatives HAS voted 410-6 in favor of the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2019, or CASE Act. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
In the past, many have observed anecdotally and cynically that even after many years of deliberation and millions of dollars in legal and expert fees often expended, the tariff at the end of the day has often the simple arithmetical average of the amounts proposed by the proponent and opponent(s) +/– a few percent.However, that pattern, if it was ever true, has been changing and  the Board has issued some surprising and encouraging decision. in recent yearsThe Board has refused to set… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
  The NTIA Broadband USA main page (scroll down) features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:15 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
SURVEYOR 5857567 EVER-TREAD PREMIUM FLOORING 5857018 FITPRO 5857016 FITPRO 5856786 LP 5856630 POOCH PALACE 5856603 X-99 5856601 MAATYX 5856598 LUFTECH 5856560 KABAK 5856558 HENO D 5856556 FINAN HL 5856448 BARROLA HL 5856426 AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES 5856181 LEWIS BAKE SHOP SPECIAL RECIPE BREAD MADE WITH REAL HONEY HONEY WHEAT FAMILY BAKERS SINCE 1925 1/2 LOAF 5856180 LEWIS BAKE SHOP SPECIAL RECIPE BREAD 12GRAIN FAMILY BAKERS SINCE 1925 1/2 LOAF 5856179 LEWIS BAKE SHOP BREAD 100% WHOLE WHEAT FAMILY… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm by Brian Shyr
 However, on September 27, 2019, two and a half years after it was originally scheduled, oral argument in Save Jobs USA v. [read post]