Search for: "House v. United States, IRS"
Results 241 - 260
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
The BOLO listings were either a lazy or targeted response (depending on who you talk to) to the significant uptick in tax exempt applications following the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:57 am
In an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:08 am
United States Attorney Laura E. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Oral arguments began in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:28 am
Supreme Court reminded us of this fact in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm
Since then, the company has grown into a leader in the arts-and-crafts retail industry, with 588 stores and around 13,000 employees across the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
Smart Charts – Allow you to compare the law and regs across states. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:27 pm
Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
Does that justify the existence of such a program of data collection on every person in the United States? [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
Assistant United States Attorney Mark Williams responded to this request: `It is our understanding that we have not reached an agreement on how to deal with all filter issues. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm
Specifically, you head over to United States Tax Court. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:51 am
After United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:39 am
United States, 487 U.S. 250 (1988) (no prejudice to a defendant where two IRS agents read in tandem from a transcript before a grand jury). . . . [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 3:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
