Search for: "Hughes v. Heard" Results 241 - 260 of 476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am by Jack Kennedy
  Supreme Court In a leapfrog appeal, the Supreme Court, comprising Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hughes and Toulson, heard submissions on 26 and 27 January 2016. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 7 June 2016 Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June Hastings Borough… [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lords Wilson, Reed, Hughes, and Toulson. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” I heard one member refer to the pen and joke that the ALI is not clarifying the law. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
The Supreme Court heard the appeal on 3-4 May 2016 and the panel consisted of Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
”  Emily Hammond does the same for the power plant preemption case Hughes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
 Anyone who has met or heard Sir Robin speak knows that he often commences a statement with "I am old enough to remember [insert a now long-forgotten case, judge or law]... [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:58 am by The Federalist Society
On February 24, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated cases Hughes v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ewing v Crown Court sitting at Cardiff and Newport ([2016] EWHC 183 (Admin)) confirms an important feature of the open justice principle: that permission is not needed in order to take notes in Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:17 am by Antonia Gold, Olswang LLP
Starting on 9 December 2015 the case was heard over two days by a panel of five, consisting of Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]